The Uneven Blame Game in Film Industry Success and Failure

In the world of cinema, the attribution of success and failure has long been a topic of discussion. A notable viewpoint comes from acclaimed filmmaker Hansal Mehta, who has expressed a rather candid perspective on the matter. According to Mehta, when a film receives acclaim and box office success, it is the leading star who often basks in the glory and receives the lion's share of the credit. Conversely, when a film does not perform well, the finger of blame is pointed squarely at the director. This dichotomous attribution highlights the complexities of responsibility and recognition in the film industry.

Film Industry's Attribution Dynamics

The director's vision is the driving force of a movie, shaping every creative aspect, from script to screen. Nonetheless, it is the star power that often pulls audiences into theaters, their names prominently displayed on posters and billboards. Recognizing the uneven distribution of credit and blame between actors and directors sheds light on the behind-the-scenes power play of the entertainment sector. This insight can metaphorically extend to different arenas where teamwork is vital to success.

Financial Markets and Recognition

Similar to the film industry, the financial market also has its share of stars and directors. Companies like Alphabet Inc. GOOG, an American multinational conglomerate and parent company of Google, are akin to blockbuster entities in the tech sector. With its leadership under the co-founders, Alphabet continues to innovate and dominate, leading the narrative of success in the technology industry. However, when examining stock performance and corporate decisions, it is often the market sentiment towards these 'star' companies that influences investor behavior, while the strategic 'directors', including CEOs and Boards, operate in the backdrop, steering the company's course through both prosperity and adversity.

success, failure, attribution